[1] Kwansei Gakuin University, School of Sociology, akihiko@kwansei.ac.jp
Abstract
The pandemic of the new coronavirus and the introduction of coronavirus vaccines prompted the production of vaccines and vaccine discourses around the world. The same situation has been observable in Japan. The purpose of this study is to discuss what I call “the social phenomenon of vaccines” in Japan. The present article will describe the characteristics of the vaccine discourse and consider the relationship between the vaccine discourse and vaccine-induced sufferings, which refer to the experience of social damages and difficulties caused by vaccines.
Firstly, I will review the research method of the previous studies of vaccination. It has been shown that both pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine existed from the beginning of the history of vaccination, and in that sense, the existence of both pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine can be considered as a part of “the social phenomenon of vaccines” from the beginning. Inspired by the Strong Program, I will explain a method which would enable me to describe both pro and anti-vaccine without a priori assumptions. One such method can be found in the repertoire analysis by Gilbert and Mulkey (1984), who analyzed controversies in scientific research. Following their method, I will explore how the vaccine discourse was developed in Japan. The vaccine discourse in Japan is found in three different types of literature, which discuss vaccine promotion, vaccine harms, and vaccine safety.
Secondly, I will identify three kinds of repertoires: “componentist repertoire”, “manipulationist repertoire” and “psychologism repertoire”. I will then discuss the features of “the social phenomenon of vaccines” by examining the relationship among these repertoires and how these repertoires work. Finally, I will discuss how vaccine discourse is related to the discourse of vaccine-induced sufferings. In conclusion, vaccination, by its very nature, cannot be separated from the impossibility of direct experience of vaccination. Therefore, the more vaccine develops, the more vaccine discourse flourishes.
Keywords: discourse analysis, repertoire, vaccine, vaccination, drug-induced sufferings
References
Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Colgrove, J. (2006). State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth-century America. Oakland: University of California Press.
Conis, E. (2014). Vaccine Nation: America’s Changing Relationship with Immunization, Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press.
Gilbert, N., and Mulkey M. (1984). Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Dis- course, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hongo, M. (2023). “Process to construct drug-induced problems”. In: Hongo and Sato eds. 2023. Pp.22-37. Hongo, M. and Sato, A. (2023), What is Drug-induced Sufferings? Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.
Kozai, T. (2019). Shutou to iu “Eisei”: Kinsei Nihon ni okeru Yobousesshu no Rekisi, Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Kozai, T. (2020). “”Hyakubun no ichi” no Rinri”. Gendai Shisou, 48(16), 24-42.
Larson, H. J., (2020). Stuck: How Vaccine Rumors Start and Why They Don’t Go Away. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2021). Oyadjima, Y. trans. Wakuchin no Uwasa. Tokyo: Misuzu Shobo (Jap- anese Translation).
Mima, T. (2020). “Houhou to shite no Han Wakuchin”, Gendai Shisou, 48(16), 102-133.
Noguchi, H. (2022). “Gisei no sisutemu” to shite no Yobousesshu Sesaku; Nihon ni okeru Yobousesshu Wakuchinka no Rekisi teki Hensen. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.
Sato, A. (2006). Drugs and Discourse: Methamphetamine in Japan, Tokyo: Toshindo.
Sato, A. (2009). “Methamphetamine use in Japan after the Second World War: Transformation of narra- tives”, Contemporary Drug Problems, 35/Winter 2008, 717-746.
Sato, A. (2017). “ Contemporary issues and the possibilities to inquiry into them in the sociology of de- viance: Discourse analysis and its usage in the research of deviance”, Japanese Sociological Review, 68(1), 87-101.
Sato, A. (2022). “ Symbolic meaning of the amphetamin-type stimulant problem throughout the restoration of Japanese Society after WWII”. In G. Hunt, T.M.J. Antin and V.A. Frank eds. 2022. Routledge Handbook of Intoxicants and Intoxication. London: Routledge. Pp. 412-433
Sato, A. (2023a). “Definition of drug-induced sufferings and Concepts of drug-induced sufferings”. In: Hongo and Sato eds. 2023. Pp.3-21.
Sato, A. (2023b). “Vaccine and drug-induced sufferings”. In: Hongo and Sato eds. 2023.Pp. 112-115. Stokoe, E., Hepburn, A., and C. Antaki. (2012). “Beware the ‘Loughborough School’ of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention”, British Journal of Sociology, 51, 486-96.
Tezuka, Y. (2010). Sengo Gyosei no Kuzo to Girenma: Yobousesshu Gyosei no Hensen. Tokyo: Fujiwara shoten.
Wetherell, M., and J. Potter. (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation, New York: Columbia University Press.
Wetherell, M., Steven, H. and J. Potter. (1987). “Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 59-79